The intention
of this work on church leaders and trust reveals the heart felt and disappointing perception of many served and led by church leaders whose behavior and
leadership has not been exemplary. To the contrary, it has been immoral and often illegal. It will also assert to establish pathways
to trust development between church leaders and the people they serve holding
each other accountable for the roles they serve in the mutual interest of their
church family and community.
What is Trust?
Trust is the safe and secure place in relationship that results from the engagement of one individual and at least one other individual who share acknowledged and affirmed mutual interests. The same enter into agreement for how they will behaviorally manage their shared image, accomplish their shared goals, share rewards or losses, and mete out consequences for activity violating their agreement.
Trust is the baseline and epicenter of operations for productive relationship development. It is the same for organizations, groups, and institutions sharing acknowledged and affirmed mutual interests. Relationships suffer where there exists lack of character in one or more parties preoccupied with self and not the relationship and people to be served.
Trust is the belief that individuals, groups, and institutions of good character, reliable and honest are effectively able to maintain and be accountable to relationship agreements entered into and deals made premised upon mutual interests. Trust is important among clergy because their leadership and direction is premised upon the ultimate human values of love, respect, and service.
Trust is believing people committed to you will help keep you from falling. |
Why Church Leaders Trusted Less
The Pew Research Center reported July 11, 2013 that of the top professions determined to contribute 'a lot' to society's well - being, church leaders come in at number 6 on the top ten with a favorability rating of 37%. This represented a trend downward by 3% from four years earlier in 2009.
Clergy are trusted with the confidences of those they lead, counsel, and serve. They are instruments of empowerment to spiritual formation, plus personal and communal relationship development. The Gallup Poll established this favorability rating negligibly different from that of United States Congress during the same period.
The Aquila Report recalls that traditionally church leaders are observed figures of authority. Church leaders receive the benefit of the doubt at the beginning of their service tenures until such time as trustworthiness challenges emerge. New pastors following pastors whose actions cost them the trust and respect of their congregations can prove to be difficult having to live out the former pastor's behavioral record.
Thom S. Rainer asks why pastors are no longer held in high esteem. He offers these and other reasons in 11 Reasons Pastors Are Trusted Less Today. They include:
- The moral failures of a minority of pastors receive widespread media coverage. This happens especially when pastors serve congregations numbering in the thousands.
- Social Media encourages criticism from a distance.
- A few pastors have poor work ethics.
- There is a failure of some pastors in two key areas; leadership and emotional intelligence.
- Some church members have a strong entitlement mentality.
- Churches are dying in America.
Rainer is more than polite. As this caption captures clearly from Wolves in Shepherd's Clothing from Tejado Hanchell. Too many pastors are exploiting their privilege and apparently fleecing their own sheep through general immature leadership behavior, sexually acting out, being violent with their families, lying, stealing and sometimes worse.
Theological Training and Trust
How do the Methodist
Theological School in Ohio, the Pontifical College Josephinum, the Trinity
Lutheran Seminary, and the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary educate and
train church leaders on trust? Registrars for each institution were directly asked whether or not specific courses in their curricula educated and trained specifically for trust.
NO was the response. All made effort to
share that while trust did not merit a stand alone course in curricula, it is
addressed among courses educating and training for pastoral services and
spiritual formation. Only the registrar at Trinity Lutheran
Seminary expressed that trust is sufficiently important to church leadership
and quality of service that church leaders would be better served as would their
congregations if more specific attention was directed to its education, training, and development.
Parishioner Perceptions on Trust
The 21st Century has proven to produce skeptical observation of leadership whether
secular or sacred. As a result, members of churches are decided that more training is desirable among church leaders in the area of trust.
Members of churches
want to be in position to hold pastors accountable and are no longer willing to
just surrender blind trust to the church leader currently serving. Clergy discover trust
is not longer simply given, it must be earned.
Church leaders do not share parishioner perceptions. Many consider that this only adds to an already overfilled plate.
Re - Development and Re - Deployment of Trust
If church leaders are to resurrect positive regard for their office of servant leadership and influence, these things must happen.
- Education and training institutions serving as conduits of preparation for service must engage congregations to work together on addressing trust concerns and design education and training tools in curriculum to proactively train for it.
- Church leaders and congregations must be in agreement with respect to service description and expectation. Both must work in harmony to develop tools for regular inspection and evaluation of church leader performance by measurable and observable standards. President Ronald Reagan may have stated it most succinctly, "Trust but verify." Early on, frequency may be weekly, bi - weekly or monthly. After the first quarter, evaluate every two months or quarters. Each time performance review is determined within acceptable parameters, the trust meter will go up. The relationship will be enhanced and should be celebrated.
- Church leaders must be competent to serve by character and preparation. Anything less is maladministration from the beginning. A productive relationship between church leaders and their congregations can become the place many will discover trust and secure enough to desire the relationship of spiritual union.
Conclusions on Church
Leaders and Trust
Church leaders’
favorability is low for the office formerly held in high esteem. Honorable
church leaders must serve in the shadows of the corrupt, the irresponsible, and
the immoral that generate scandal after scandal. Honorable church leaders
assert that some remain to hold up the blood stained banner and that the
influence of Jesus is yet alive.
Theological schools
might consider re - examining their approaches to pastoral education and training to include the elephant in the room, the issue of trust for church
leaders. A collaboration of church educators, church leaders, and parishioners
would best serve the church in this area desperate for positive development.
Conditions precipitate the need for this approach. Support determined necessary comes by conclusion reached in Angie Ward's work in Christianity Today in August 2006 entitled, Leader's Insight: Can I Trust You? Strengthening the Three Legs of Trust; Character, Competence, and Communication.
She writes, "The unavoidable conclusion makes clear trust is critical to a church’s health and ultimately, to its ministry effectiveness. When people in a church do not trust each other or their leaders, the church becomes a diseased organism that will poison those who come into contact with it, or shrivel up and stop producing fruit – oftentimes both."
By God's Grace, might theological schools, Bible colleges, church leaders and the people of congregations work together to become a more wholesome community than church behavior can too often demonstrate.
She writes, "The unavoidable conclusion makes clear trust is critical to a church’s health and ultimately, to its ministry effectiveness. When people in a church do not trust each other or their leaders, the church becomes a diseased organism that will poison those who come into contact with it, or shrivel up and stop producing fruit – oftentimes both."
By God's Grace, might theological schools, Bible colleges, church leaders and the people of congregations work together to become a more wholesome community than church behavior can too often demonstrate.